Three situations where the wrong design is the most expensive thing on your roadmap.
Internal team is debating Salesforce vs. ServiceMax vs. building it themselves. Nobody has done this at your scale before. You need an honest read on fit before any vendor sells you a roadmap.
You're 6 weeks into a build with a global SI. Something feels off — the object model, the territory hierarchy, the warranty flow. You need a second opinion from someone who isn't selling you the build.
Service Cloud is live. The next step is Field Service — but in what order, with which integrations, against which contracts? You need a phased plan you can actually fund and ship.
Discovery. Architecture. Readout. Yours to keep.
Real artefacts, not slideware. Yours to take anywhere.
Object model + integrations + data flow on a single sheet. Hangs on a wall. Survives the meeting. Future engineers can read it without a translator.
What ships in weeks 1–8, 9–16, 17–24. With sequencing rationale. Including which workstreams can run in parallel and which can't.
The architecture risks named explicitly — polygon hierarchy, skill expiry, mobile offline, integration ownership, data residency. Each with a written mitigation and an estimated cost-of-fix-later.
For every adjacent capability — IoT, telematics, dispatch overlay, customer portal — a written recommendation: build on platform, buy a managed package, or integrate an existing system. Vendor-neutral.
If we're the right fit to build it, we'll say so. If a global SI is better for your scale, we'll say that too. We'll point to the named SI partners we'd recommend and why. We don't hold the work hostage.
Two pages your CIO can take to the audit committee. Cost, risk, payback, and the decision framework. Written so it survives without you in the room.
Three engagement shapes. Pick the one that fits where you are.
A focused review of an existing or in-flight design. Read the SI's design docs, interview key stakeholders, surface the architecture risks, deliver a written second-opinion brief.
The full thing. Discovery, architecture, phased plan, risk register, build/buy/integrate decisions, executive summary. Priced by operation size and the integration count.
10 hours/month of named architect time on retainer. Code reviews, design reviews, vendor calls, interview support, occasional onsite. 90-day commitment minimum.
Start with a 30-minute working session. No deck, no demo. We'll sketch the highest-leverage three features for your operation, live, and decide together if a 4-week sprint makes sense.
Book a 30-min review